References

James GA Biofilms in chronic wounds.: Wound Repair Regen; 2007

del Pozo JL, Patel R. The challenge of treating biofilmassociated bacterial infections. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2007; 82:(2)204-209

Hoiby N ESCMID guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of biofilm infections 2014. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015;

Wolcott RD, Ehrlich GD. Biofilms and chronic infections. JAMA. 2008; 299:(22)2682-2684

Kim M Bacterial interactions with the host epithelium. Cell Host Microbe. 2010; 8:(1)20-35

Raymond B Subversion of trafficking, apoptosis, and innate immunity by type III secretion system effectors. Trends Microbiol. 2013; 21:(8)430-441

Bartlett AH, Hulten KG. Staphylococcus aureus pathogenesis: secretion systems, adhesins, and invasins. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2010; 29:(9)860-861

Rickard AH Production of cell-cell signalling molecules by bacteria isolated from human chronic wounds. J Appl Microbiol. 2010; 108:(5)1509-1522

Wolcott R. Clinical wound healing using signal inhibitors. In: Balaban N (ed). : Springer; 2008

Ding Z, Atmakuri K, Christie PJ. The outs and ins of bacterial type IV secretion substrates. Trends Microbiol. 2003; 11:(11)527-535

Branda SS Biofilms: the matrix revisited. Trends Microbiol. 2005; 13:(1)20-26

Hall-Stoodley L, Stoodley P. Evolving concepts in biofilm infections. Cell Microbiol. 2009; 11:(7)1034-1043

Stewart PS, Costerton JW. Antibiotic resistance of bacteria in biofilms. Lancet. 2001; 358:(9276)135-138

Whitfield GB, Marmont LS, Howell PL. Enzymatic modifications of exopolysaccharides enhance bacterial persistence. Front Microbiol. 2015; 6

Wolcott RD, Kennedy JP, Dowd SE. Regular debridement is the main tool for maintaining a healthy wound bed in most chronic wounds. J Wound Care. 2009; 18:(2)54-56

Wolcott RD Biofilm maturity studies indicate sharp debridement opens a timedependent therapeutic window. J Wound Care. 2010; 19:(8)320-328

Miller KG Next science wound gel technology, a novel agent that inhibits biofilm development by gram-positive and gramnegative wound pathogens. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014; 58:(6)3060-3072

Field FK, Kerstein MD. Overview of wound healing in a moist environment. Am J Surg. 1994; 167:(1A)2S-6S

Velnar T, Bailey T, Smrkolj V. The wound healing process: an overview of the cellular and molecular mechanisms. J Int Med Res. 2009; 37:(5)1528-1542

Diegelmann RF, Evans MC. Wound healing: an overview of acute, fibrotic and delayed healing. Front Biosci. 2004; 9:283-289

Rhoads DD, Wolcott RD, Percival SL. Biofilms in wounds: management strategies. J Wound Care. 2008; 17:(11)502-508

Margolis DJ Surrogate end points for the treatment of diabetic neuropathic foot ulcers. Diabetes Care. 2003; 26:(6)1696-1700

Cowan L, Phillips P, Liesenfeld B Caution: when combining topical wound treatments, more is not always better. Wound Practice and Research. 2011; 19:(2)60-64

Wolcott RD Chronic wounds and the medical biofilm paradigm. J Wound Care. 2010; 19:(2)45-50

Parsek MR, Singh PK. Bacterial biofilms: an emerging link to disease pathogenesis. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2003; 57:677-701

Disrupting the biofilm matrix improves wound healing outcomes

02 February 2019
Volume 3 · Issue 1

Abstract

Objective:

The most unyielding molecular component of biofilm communities is the matrix structure that it can create around the individual microbes that constitute the biofilm. The type of polymeric substances (polymeric sugars, bacterial proteins, bacterial DNA and even co-opted host substances) are dependent on the microbial species present within the biofilm. The extracellular polymeric substances that make up the matrix give the wound biofilm incredible colony defences against host immunity, host healing and wound care treatments. This polymeric slime layer, which is secreted by bacteria, encases the population of microbes, creating a physical barrier that limits the ingress of treatment agents to the bacteria. The aim of this study was to determine if degrading the wound biofilm matrix would improve wound healing outcomes and if so, if there was a synergy between treating agents that disrupted biofilm defenses with Next Science BlastX Antimicrobial Wound Gel (wound gel) and cidal agents (topical antibiotics).

Method:

A three-armed randomised controlled trial was designed to determine if standard of care (SOC) was superior to SOC plus wound gel (SOC + gel) and wound gel alone. The wound gel used in this study contains components that directly attack the biofilm extracellular polymeric substance. The gel was applied directly to the wound bed on a Monday–Wednesday–Friday interval, either alone or with SOC topical antibiotics.

Results:

Using a surrogate endpoint of 50% reduction in wound volume, the results showed that SOC healed at 53%, wound gel healed at 80%, while SOC plus wound gel showed 93% of wounds being successfully treated.

Conclusion:

By directly targeting the wound biofilm matrix, wound healing outcomes are improved.

Chronic wounds, regardless of the aetiology, exhibit similar clinical behaviours, such as stalled healing and exudate production, which are directly related to microorganisms on the wound surface growing as a biofilm.1 It is now widely recognised that all chronic infections are produced by microorganisms in the biofilm mode of growth.2,3 How biofilm produces a host infection is now well defined at a molecular, cellular and clinical level.4

There are countless molecular strategies used by bacteria, yeast and fungus to produce host infection, which we see clinically as chronic infection.5,6 Of the subcellular pathways employed by biofilm, four areas of research hold great promise for wound care. The first is how and why microbes express adhesins, surface complexes that target host tissues, to allow them to attach to a host environment.7 Second is the vast array of communication molecules (quorum sensing) produced by different species of microbes to organise the activity of the entire biofilm.8,9 Third is the amazing variety of ‘effectors’ (small proteins), which bacteria can secrete from a number of different secretory systems (for example, T3SS and T6SS), which take over the function of the wound bed cells.6,10 By producing cellular senescence, with these effectors, the biofilm establishes a stable attachment site from which to continue its persistent infection.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Wound Central and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for wound care professionals. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Access to clinical or professional articles

  • New content and clinical updates each month