Reynolds M, Kelly DA, Walker NJ Use of Integra in the management of complex hand wounds from cancer resection and nonburn trauma. Hand (N Y). 2018; 13:(1)74-79

Boyce DE, Shokrollahi K. ABC of wound healing: reconstructive surgery. BMJ. 2006; 332:(7543)710-712

Rubayi S. Complications of flap surgery.: Springer; 2015

Brenner MJ, Moyer JS. Skin and composite grafting techniques in facial reconstruction for skin cancer. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2017; 25:(3)347-363

Faulhaber J, Felcht M, Teerling G Long-term results after reconstruction of full thickness scalp defects with a dermal regeneration template. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2010; 24:(5)572-577

Dempsey SG, Miller CH, Hill RC Functional Insights from the Proteomic Inventory of Ovine Forestomach Matrix. J Proteome Res. 2019; 18:(4)1657-1668

Lun S, Irvine SM, Johnson KD A functional extracellular matrix biomaterial derived from ovine forestomach. Biomaterials. 2010; 31:(16)4517-4529

Irvine SM, Cayzer J, Todd EM Quantification of in vitro and in vivo angiogenesis stimulated by ovine forestomach matrix biomaterial. Biomaterials. 2011; 32:(27)6351-6361

Sizeland KH, Wells HC, Kelly SJ Collagen fibril response to strain in scaffolds from ovine forestomach for tissue engineering. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2017; 3:(10)2550-2558

Dempsey SG, Miller CH, Schueler J A novel chemotactic factor derived from the extracellular matrix protein decorin recruits mesenchymal stromal cells in vitro and in vivo. PLoS One. 2020; 15:(7)

Bohn GA, Schultz GS, Liden BA Proactive and early aggressive wound management: a shift in strategy developed by a consensus panel examining the current science, prevention, and management of acute and chronic wounds. Wounds. 2017; 29:(11)S37-S42

Simcock J, May BC. Ovine forestomach matrix as a substrate for singlestage split-thickness graft reconstruction. Eplasty. 2013; 13

Ferzoco SJ. Early experience outcome of a reinforced bioscaffold in inguinal hernia repair: a case series. Int J Surg Open. 2018; 12:9-11

Sawyer MA. New ovine polymer-reinforced bioscaffold in hiatal hernia repair. JSLS. 2018; 22:(4)

Scarritt M, Murdock M, Badylak SF. Biologic scaffolds composed of extracellular matrix for regenerative medicine.: Elsevier; 2019

Janis JE, Kwon RK, Attinger CE. The new reconstructive ladder: modifications to the traditional model. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011; 127:205S-212S

Goel P, Badash I, Gould DJ Options for covering large soft tissue defects in the setting of trauma. Curr Trauma Rep. 2018; 4:(4)316-325

Ellis CV, Kulber DA. Acellular dermal matrices in hand reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012; 130:(5)256S-269S

Graham GP, Helmer SD, Haan JM, Khandelwal A. The use of Integra Dermal Regeneration Template in the reconstruction of traumatic degloving injuries. J Burn Care Res. 2013; 34:(2)261-266

Hoang D, Steven P, Chen VW Use of acellular dermal matrix following fasciectomy for the treatment of Dupuytren's disease. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019; 7:(5)

Negron L, Lun S, May BC. Ovine forestomach matrix biomaterial is a broad spectrum inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinases and neutrophil elastase. Int Wound J. 2014; 11:(4)392-397

Overbeck N, Nagvajara GM, Ferzoco S In-vivo evaluation of a reinforced ovine biologic: a comparative study to available hernia mesh repair materials. Hernia. 2020;

Nguyen DQ, Potokar TS, Price P. An objective long-term evaluation of Integra (a dermal skin substitute) and split thickness skin grafts, in acute burns and reconstructive surgery. Burns. 2010; 36:(1)23-28

Heimbach DM, Warden GD, Luterman A Multicenter postapproval clinical trial of Integra dermal regeneration template for burn treatment. J Burn Care Rehabil. 2003; 24:(1)42-48

Peck MD, Kessler M, Meyer AA, Bonham Morris PA. A trial of the effectiveness of artificial dermis in the treatment of patients with burns greater than 45% total body surface area. J Trauma. 2002; 52:(5)971-978

Sarikaya A, Record R, Wu CC Antimicrobial activity associated with extracellular matrices. Tissue Eng. 2002; 8:(1)63-71

Extracellular matrix graft for reconstruction over exposed structures: a pilot case series

02 July 2021
Volume 5 · Issue 3



Soft tissue defects, especially those involving exposed vital structures, present a reconstructive challenge because poor vascularity of such defects typically makes immediate skin grafting unviable. Where flap procedures are inappropriate or not possible, dermal matrices represent an alternative reconstructive option for defects with denuded vital structures. With dermal matrices becoming increasingly available and technologically advanced, we evaluated an ovine-derived extracellular matrix graft in the reconstruction of complex soft tissue defects involving exposed vital structures.


Six cases of soft tissue defects exhibiting denuded vital structures underwent reconstruction using an ovine forestomach matrix graft as a dermal matrix. Grafts were fixed directly into defects for immediate coverage and subsequently temporised defects via granulation tissue formation for later skin graft or secondary closure. Defect granulation and epithelialisation were monitored until closure and the final aesthetic and functional outcomes were evaluated.


Complete healing was achieved in all cases, with defect granulation becoming observable within one to two weeks and complete granulation occurring within one to six weeks. Granulation tissue resulting from the graft was suitable for skin grafting, with 100% take of skin grafts after one week and complete re-epithelialisation in two to three weeks in the four cases that received a skin graft. Good cosmetic, functional and patient satisfaction outcomes were achieved in all cases.


The present series demonstrates our initial use of an extracellular matrix-based dermal matrix in reconstructing defects with exposed vital structures. While such dermal matrices do not supersede or replace flap procedures, they represent an alternative option on the reconstructive ladder in cases where flap procedures are not appropriate or possible.

Reconstruction of defects presenting denuded vital structures is challenging. Exposed vessels, nerves, tendons, joints and bone must be promptly covered but immediate closure via a split-thickness skin graft (STSG) is not always a viable option. If not covered with adequately perfused soft tissue, exposed vital structures are at high risk of desiccation, necrosis and/or infection, posing severe functional consequences.1 As exposed vital structures often have insufficient vascularisation to support an STSG, more complex surgical techniques from the reconstructive ladder are required.2 Flap reconstruction is typically employed for coverage of exposed structures and to provide definitive closure. Depending on the nature of the defect and surrounding tissues, flap reconstruction options can range from relatively straightforward fasciocutaneous flaps to free flaps requiring more complex microvascular surgery. Flap techniques are recognised as reliable options for reconstruction of complex defects but, depending on the specific defect, flap type and patient factors, flap reconstruction may be complicated by dehiscence, infection, thrombosis, seroma/haematoma, ischaemia and necrosis.3 Such complications require medical intervention to stabilise compromised flaps and additional surgery may be necessary to attempt salvage because flap failure has severe impacts on the reconstructive outcomes.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Wound Central and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for wound care professionals. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Access to clinical or professional articles

  • New content and clinical updates each month