References

Stevens DL, Bryant AE. Necrotizing soft-tissue infections. N Engl J Med. 2017; 377:(23)2253-2265 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1600673

Diab J, Bannan A, Pollitt T. Necrotising fasciitis. BMJ. 2020; 369 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1428

Tillett R, Ward T, Morgan M, Stone C. The management of necrotising fasciitis. In: Stone C (ed). : TFM Publishing Limited; 2008

Davoudian P, Flint NJ. Necrotizing fasciitis. Contin Educ Anaesth Crit Care Pain. 2012; 12:(5)245-250 https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaceaccp/mks033

Chen K, Klingel M, McLeod S Presentation and outcomes of necrotizing soft tissue infections. Int J Gen Med. 2017; 10:215-220 https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S131768

Das DK, Baker MG, Venugopal K. Increasing incidence of necrotizing fasciitis in New Zealand: a nationwide study over the period 1990 to 2006. J Infect. 2011; 63:(6)429-433 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2011.07.019

Arif N, Yousfi S, Vinnard C. Deaths from necrotizing fasciitis in the United States, 2003–2013. Epidemiol Infect. 2016; 144:(6)1338-1344 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268815002745

Wagstaff MJ, Salna IM, Caplash Y, Greenwood JE. Biodegradable Temporising Matrix (BTM) for the reconstruction of defects following serial debridement for necrotising fasciitis: a case series. Burns Open. 2019; 3:(1)12-30 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burnso.2018.10.002

Stewart SK, Vu J, McCulloch GA. Necrotising fasciitis deaths in Australia: patient characteristics and potential areas for improvement in clinical management. ANZ J Surg. 2020; 90:(11)2329-2333 https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.16228

Hakkarainen TW, Kopari NM, Pham TN, Evans HL. Necrotizing soft tissue infections: Review and current concepts in treatment, systems of care, and outcomes. Curr Probl Surg. 2014; 51:(8)344-362 https://doi.org/10.1067/j.cpsurg.2014.06.001

Ajitha MB, Archana CS, Avinash K. A study on necrotizing fasciitis with the etiological factors and microbiological aspects with its prevalence. Int J Surg Sci. 2020; 4:(2)167-171 https://doi.org/10.33545/surgery.2020.v4.i2c.413

Wong CH, Yam AK, Tan AB, Song C. Approach to debridement in necrotizing fasciitis. Am J Surg. 2008; 196:(3)e19-e24 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.08.076

de Paula FM, Pinheiro EA, Oliveira VM A case report of successful treatment of necrotizing fasciitis using negative pressure wound therapy. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019; 98:(2) https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000013283

Simman R. Wound closure and the reconstructive ladder in plastic surgery. J Am Col Certif Wound Spec. 2009; 1:(1)6-11 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcws.2008.10.003

Janis JE, Kwon RK, Attinger CE. The new reconstructive ladder: modifications to the traditional model. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011; 127:205S-212S https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e318201271c

Pek CH, Lim J, Ng HW Extensive necrotizing fasciitis after fat grafting for bilateral breast augmentation: recommended approach and management. Arch Plast Surg. 2015; 42:(03)365-367 https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2015.42.3.365

Akhtar S, Hasham S, Abela C, Phipps AR. The use of Integra in necrotizing fasciitis. Burns. 2006; 32:(2)251-254 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2005.06.009

Ferzli G, Sukato DC, Mourad M Aggressive necrotizing fasciitis of the head and neck resulting in massive defects. Ear Nose Throat J. 2019; 98:(4)197-200 https://doi.org/10.1177/0145561319839789

Bay C, Chizmar Z, Reece EM Comparison of skin substitutes for acute and chronic wound management. Semin Plast Surg. 2021; 35:(03)171-180 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1731463

Dai C, Shih S, Khachemoune A. Skin substitutes for acute and chronic wound healing: an updated review. J Dermatolog Treat. 2020; 31:(6)639-648 https://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2018.1530443

Abed S, Dantzer E, Souraud JB [The place of skin substitutes in surgical treatment of necrotising cellulitis: Seven cases. Ann Dermatol Venereol. 2014; 141:(1)49-52 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annder.2013.07.022

De Francesco F, Busato A, Mannucci S Artificial dermal substitutes for tissue regeneration: comparison of the clinical outcomes and histological findings of two templates. J Int Med Res. 2020; 48:(8) https://doi.org/10.1177/0300060520945508

Eugénie C, Albert DM, Diane F. The use of Integra for abdominal reconstruction after a necrotizing fasciitis in a child. J Pediatr Surg Case Rep. 2020; 59 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsc.2020.101518

Hever P, Cavale N. Matriderm vs Integra dermal regeneration template single layer as a dermal substitute for synchronous autologous skin grafting in necrotising fasciitis–a case study. Adv Plastic Reconstr Surg. 2017; 01:(02)63-66 https://doi.org/10.31700/2572-6684.000113

Tsuge I, Matsui M, Takeda T Less-invasive treatment for group A Streptococcal fasciitis with rapid antigen detection test and collagen/gelatin sponge. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021; 9:(9) https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003793

Ben-Nakhi M, Eltayeb H, Milad H, Al Saqqa B. The use of MatriDerm and skin graft for reconstruction of complex wounds. Wounds Middle East. 2020; 7:(1)6-11

Gonzalez SR, Wolter KG, Yuen JC. Infectious complications associated with the use of Integra: a systematic review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020; 8:(7) https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002869

Wagstaff MJ, Schmitt BJ, Coghlan P A biodegradable polyurethane dermal matrix in reconstruction of free flap donor sites: a pilot study. Eplasty. 2015; 15

Greenwood JE, Dearman BL. Comparison of a sealed, polymer foam biodegradable temporizing matrix against Integra dermal regeneration template in a porcine wound model. J Burn Care Res. 2012; 33:(1)163-173 https://doi.org/10.1097/BCR.0b013e318233fac1

Dearman BL, Li A, Greenwood JE. Optimization of a polyurethane dermal matrix and experience with a polymer-based cultured composite skin. J Burn Care Res. 2014; 35:(5)437-448 https://doi.org/10.1097/BCR.0000000000000061

Wagstaff MJ, Caplash Y, Greenwood JE. Reconstruction of an anterior cervical necrotizing fasciitis defect using a biodegradable polyurethane dermal substitute. Eplasty. 2017; 17

Sreedharan S, Morrison E, Cleland H Biodegradable temporising matrix for necrotising soft tissue infections: a case report. Australasian J Plast Surg. 2019; 2:(1)106-109 https://doi.org/10.34239/ajops.v2i1.72

Solanki NS, York B, Gao Y A consecutive case series of defects reconstructed using NovoSorb Biodegradable Temporising Matrix: initial experience and early results. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2020; 73:(10)1845-1853 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2020.05.067

ALNafisee D, Casey MC, Kelly JL. Use of a synthetic biodegradable temporising matrix after necrotising fasciitis infection of the thigh. BMJ Case Rep. 2022; 15:(7) https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2021-248656

Use of a bilayer biodegradable synthetic dermal matrix for the management of defects arising from necrotising fasciitis

02 September 2022
Volume 6 · Issue 3

Abstract

The aim of this article is to provide a brief overview of necrotising fasciitis, including causative factors, incidence, diagnosis and clinical outcomes. Various surgical treatment options are outlined, including methods of soft tissue reconstruction after wide excision of infected and necrotic tissues. The role of dermal matrices, including a synthetic biodegradable temporising matrix made of polyurethane, are described in terms of wound bed preparation, surgical application and clinical outcomes.

Necrotising fasciitis is a life-threatening condition that arises from the rapid onset and progression of infection through the soft tissues, extending from the epidermis to the deep muscle layers.1 The extent of injury can be severe and treatment for necrotising fasciitis can result in large skin defects, risk of limb amputation, and exposure of deep structures, such as bone and tendon, further complicating management of these complex wounds.

Diagnosis is not always straightforward, with patients often presenting with mild, diffuse symptoms and signs that do not immediately indicate the threat of rapid escalation of tissue destruction and the mortality risks associated with untreated necrotising fasciitis.2 Education of frontline healthcare staff is therefore key to ensuring the urgent identification of likely symptoms.

Various types of necrotising fasciitis have been classified based on the number and/or type of associated organisms.1,3,4 Type I is most common and is polymicrobial, in which anaerobic and aerobic bacteria proliferate synergistically. Type II is less common and is largely unimicrobial due to Group A, beta-haemolytic Streptococcus, occasionally in combination with a Staphylococcus and/or methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Type III is rare but has a high mortality rate of 30–40%, and is associated with Clostridium spp. and marine bacteria such as Vibrio, Aeromonas and Klebsiella spp. Opportunistic entry of bacteria can occur via the skin through relatively minor skin breaches, cuts and bites; however, it can also arise in areas of closed trauma, having been seeded by circulating bacteria from another portal of entry. It is more common in males and most commonly involves the extremities.5 Other risk factors and comorbidities include those who are older, immunocompromised, have diabetes or are obese (body mass index (BMI)>30kg/m2), although it can also be idiopathic in otherwise healthy individuals.3 Delays in clinical presentation and receiving timely medical attention may also increase the risk to patients who live in remote communities and/or those in lower socioeconomic communities.2

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Wound Central and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for wound care professionals. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Access to clinical or professional articles

  • New content and clinical updates each month