References

Hobizal KB, Wukich DK. Diabetic foot infections: current concept review. Diabet Foot Ankle. 2012; https://doi.org/0.3402/dfa.v3i0.18409

Van Battum P, Schaper N., Prompers L Differences in minor amputation rate in diabetic foot disease throughout Europe are in part explained by differences in disease severity at presentation. Diabet Med. 2011; 28:(2)199-205

Oates A, Bowling FL, Boulton AJ, McBain AJ. A molecular and culture-based assessment of the microbial diversity of the diabetic chronic foot wounds and contralateral skin sites. J Clin Microbiol. 2012; 50:(7)2263-2271

Eleftheriadou I, Tentolouris N, Argiana V Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in diabetic foot infections. Drugs. 2010; 70:(14)1785-1797

Lázaro-Martínez JL, Aragón-Sánchez J, García-Morales E. Antibiotics versus conservative surgery for treating diabetic foot osteomyelitis: a randomized comparative trial. Diabetes Care. 2014; 37:(3)789-795

Lázaro-Martinez JL, Aragon-Sanchez J, García-Morales E. Antibiotics vs conservative surgery for treating diabetic foot osteomyelitis. a randomized comparitive trial. Diabetes Care. 2014; 37:789-795

Moulik PK, Mtonga R, Gill GV. Amputation and mortality in new-onset diabetic foot ulcers stratified by etiology. Diabetes Care. 2003; 26:(2)491-494

Kvachadze L, Balarjishvili N, Meskhi T Evaluation of lytic activity of staphylococcal bacteriophage Sb-1 against freshly isolated clinical pathogens. Micro biotechnol. 2011; 4:(5)643-650

Kutateladze M, Adamia R. Phage therapy experience at the Eliava Institute. Médecine et maladies infectieuses. 2008; 38:(8)426-430

Staphylococcal Bacteriophage, Registration Certificate of Pharmaceutical Product NR-004895, N02-132/o order of 31th of March, 2011, State Regulation Agency of Medical Activities, Ministry of Labour, Health and Social Affairs of Georgia.

Seth AK, Geringer MR, Nguyen KT Bacteriophage therapy for Staphylococcus aureus biofilm–infected wounds: a new approach to chronic wound care. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013; 131:(2)225-234

Lobocka M, Hejnowicz M, Dabrowski K Genomics of staphylocollal Twort-like phages - potential therapeutics of the postantibiotic era. Adv Virus Res. 2012; 83:143-216

Abedon ST, Kuhl SJ, Blasdel BG, Kutter EM. Phage treatment of human infections. Bacteriophage. 2011; 1:66-85

Chan BK, Abedon ST, Loc-Carrillo C. Phage cocktails and the future of phage therapy. Future Microbiol. 2013; 8:(6)769-783

Kutter E, De Vos D, Gvasalia G Phage therapy in clinical practice: treatment of human infections. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2010; 11:(1)69-86

Rhoads DD, Wolcott RD, Kuskowski MA Bacteriophage therapy of venous leg ulcers in humans; Results of a phase I safety trial. J Wound Care. 2009; 18:(6)237-243

Merabishvili M, Pirnay J-P, Verbeken G Quality-controlled small-scale production of a well-defined bacteriophage cocktail for use in human clinical trials. PLoS one. 2009; 4:(3)

Kutter E, De Vos D, Gvasalia G Phage therapy in clinical practice: treatment of human infections. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2010; 11:(1)69-86

Rose T, Verbeken G, DeVos D Experimental phage therapy of burn wound infection: difficult first steps. Int J Burn Trauma. 2014; 4:(2)66-73

Kažmierczak Z, Górski A, Dabrowska K. Facing antibiotic resistance: Staphylococcus aureus phages as a medical tool. Viruses. 2014; 6:(7)2551-2570

Bacteriophages: biology and applications. In: Kutter E, Sulakvelidze A. (eds). : CRC Press; 2005

Bacteriophage therapy of Staphylococcus aureus including MRSA. 2011. http://bit.ly/28JcpCa (accessed 20 June 2016)

Baker AG. Staphylococcus bacteriophage lysate topical and parenteral use in allergic patients. Pa Med J. 1963; 66:25-28

Salmon GG, Symonds M. Staphage lysate therapy in chronic staphylococcal infections. J Med Soc N J. 1963; 60:188-193

Angel MF, Ramasastry SS, Manders EK Beneficial effect of Staphage Lysate in the treatment of chronic recurring Hidradenitis suppurativa. Surg Forum. 1987; 38

Wright A, Hawkins CH, Anggard EE, Harper DR. A controlled clinical trial of a therapeutic bacteriophage preparation in chronic otitis due to antibiotic-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa; a preliminary report of efficacy. Clin Otolaryngol. 2009; 34:(4)349-357

Pherecydes Pharma. Evaluation of phage therapy for the treatment of Escherichia Coli and Pseudomonas Aeruginosa wound infections in burned patients (PHAGOBURN). http://1.usa.gov/1YtJ43U (accessed 15 June 2016)

Lipsky BA, Berendt AR, Cornia PB 2012; Infectious Diseases Society of America clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of diabetic foot infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2012; 54:(12)e132-e173

Centre Watch. FDA Approved Drugs. http://bit.ly/28IXZVm (accessed 20 June 2016)

Brüssow H. What is needed for phage therapy to become a reality in Western medicine?. Virology. 2012; 434:(2)138-142

Spichler A, Hurwitz BL, Armstrong DG, Lipsky BA. Microbiology of diabetic foot infection: from Louis Pasteur to ‘crime scene investigation’. BMC Medicine. 2015; 13

Bacteriophage treatment of intransigent diabetic toe ulcers: a case series

02 May 2021
Volume 5 · Issue 2

Abstract

Objective:

Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) infections are a growing public health problem, with increasing prevalence, poor response to antibiotics and bacterial resistance to traditional antimicrobials leading to increased morbidity and mortality. Bacteriophages (phages), the viruses that target specific bacteria, are one option for addressing bacterial infections, especially where antibiotics fail. Of particular value is a class of virulent staphylococcal phages that hit almost all Staphylococcus aureus, including most methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains. Here we report a continuous case series assessing the effectiveness of treating infected and poorly vascularised toe ulcers with exposed bone, after failure of recommended antibiotic therapy, using topically applied Staphylococcus aureus-specific phage.

Method:

This was a compassionate-use case series of nine patients with diabetes and poorly perfused toe ulcers containing culture-proven Staphylococcus aureus infected bone and soft tissue, who had responded poorly to recommended antibiotic therapy. Six representative cases are presented here. The only generally accepted other option in each case was toe amputation. Exposed portions of the infected phalanges were removed in three cases and left in place in two cases. One case presented as a micro-clot induced gangrene following vascular stenting. In this case, phage were used to prevent infection. The phage used was a commercially available fully sequenced preparation of staphylococcal phage Sb-1. Phage solution was applied topically to the ulcerations once weekly, following standard good wound care. The amount of phage solution applied varied from 0.1 to 0.5 cc depending on volume and area of the ulceration.

Results:

All infections responded to the phage applications and the ulcers healed in an average of seven weeks with infected bone debridement. One ulcer, where vascularity was extremely poor and bone was not removed to preserve hallux function, required 18 weeks of treatment. In the case of the toe with the micro-clot gangrene, the toe was salvaged and healed in seven weeks without complications.

Conclusion:

Topical application of a staph mono-phage preparation can be used successfully to treat infected toe ulcerations with bone involvement, despite very poor vascularity and failure of antibiotic treatment. The success within this small series provides the groundwork for controlled clinical trials of staph phage for diabetic foot infections.

The escalating problem of antibiotic resistance and fear of returning to the pre-antibiotic era is driving the search for additional options. One possibility is the use of bacteriophages—viruses that only target specific bacteria, while leaving human cells and most other bacteria untouched. Bacteriophages (phages) have been used extensively in some countries as an alternative to antibiotics or together with antibiotics. This combination can shorten the duration of antibiotic treatment by creating two very different and complementary modes of attack, also potentially helping prevent the development of antibiotic resistant bacteria.1 Antibiotic resistance has no bearing on phage effectiveness. Phage treatment also offers a number of advantages in tackling recalcitrant peripheral ulcer infections, as not only can phage treat antibiotic-resistant infections, but they can also effectively treat cases where vascular compromise limits antibiotic effectiveness even when the bacteria are sensitive in vitro to the antibiotics prescribed.

More than 50% of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) become infected1 with ~18% resulting in minor amputation at best.2 The most common infective organism is meticillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), but meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) makes the infection harder to treat.3 MRSA infections often lead to increased time to wound healing, longer hospitalisations, and increased amputations.4 Antibiotic treatment of the infection often fails, even when clinical treatment guidelines are closely followed,5 with failure common even when the bacteria are sensitive to the antibiotics prescribed, especially when the infection involves bone. Currently there is controversy regarding the recommended duration of antibiotic therapy.6 The failure of antibiotics to successfully treat ulcers with bone infection often leads to amputation, and this is associated with high costs, disability and significantly increased mortality, even after accounting for comorbidities such as peripheral vascular disease.7

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Wound Central and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for wound care professionals. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Access to clinical or professional articles

  • New content and clinical updates each month