References

Wong R, Geyer S, Weninger W The dynamic anatomy and patterning of skin. Exp Dermatol. 2016; 25:(2)92-98 https://doi.org/10.1111/exd.12832

Schwartz J, Friedman AJ. Exogenous factors in skin barrier repair. J Drugs Dermatol. 2016; 15:(11)1289-1294

Lee T, Friedman A. Skin barrier health: regulation and repair of the stratum corneum and the role of over-the-counter skin care. J Drugs Dermatol. 2016; 15:(9)1047-1051

Woo KY, Beeckman D, Chakravarthy D. Management of moisture-associated skin damage: a scoping review. Adv Skin Wound Care. 201; 30:(11)494-501 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ASW.0000525627.54569.da

Woo KY, Sibbald RG, Ayello EA Peristomal skin complications and management. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2009; 22:(11)522-532 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ASW.0000305497.15768.cb

LeBlanc K, Baranoski S Skin tears: the forgotten wound. Nurs Manage. 2013; 45:(12)36-46 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NUMA.0000456648.49038.df

Gray M, Black JM, Baharestani MM Moisture-associated skin damage: overview and pathophysiology. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2011; 38:(3)233-41 https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0b013e318215f798

Bianchi J. Causes and strategies for moisture lesions. Nurs Times. 2012; 108:(5)20-22

Beeckman D, Lancker AV, Hecke AV, Vergaeghe S. A systematic review and meta-analysis of incontinence-associated dermatitis, incontinence, and moisture as risk factors for pressure ulcer development. Res Nurs Health. 2014; 37:(3)204-218 https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.21593

Carville K, Smith J. Report on the effectiveness of comprehensive wound assessment and documentation in the community. Primary Intention. 2004; 12:(1)41-49

Rittié L, Fisher GJ. Natural and sun-induced aging of human skin. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2015; 5:(1) https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a015370

Rayner R, Carville K, Leslie G, Roberts P. A review of patient and skin characteristics associated with skin tears. J Wound Care. 2015; 24:(9)406-414 https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2015.24.9.406

Kaya G, Saurat J. Dermatoporosis: a new concept in skin aging. European Geriatric Medicine. 2013; 1:(4)216-219 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurger.2010.06.002

Nix DH. Validity and reliability of the perineal assessment tool. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2002; 48:(2)43-49

Junkin J, Selekof JL. Beyond ‘diaper rash’: incontinenceassociated dermatitis: Does it have you seeing RED?. Nursing. 2008; 38:56hn1-hn10 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NURSE.0000341725.55531.e2

Steininger A, Jukic-Puntigam M, Urban W Eine DelphiStudie zur Inhaltsvaliditätsprüfung des deutschen Inkontinenz-assoziierten Dermatitis Interventions Tools (IADIT-D). Pflegewissenschaft. 2012; 12:85-92

Brown DS. Perineal dermatitis: can we measure it?. Ostomy Wound Manage. 1993; 39:(7)28-30

Long MA, Reed LA, Dunning K, Ying J. Incontinenceassociated dermatitis in a long-term acute care facility. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2012; 39:(3)318-327 https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0b013e3182486fd7

Comparison of the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of three skin protectants in the management of incontinent dermatitis. 1997. http://bit.ly/2F2aokC

Borchert K, Bliss DZ, Savik K The incontinence associated dermatitis and its severity instrument: development and validation. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2010; 37:(5)527-535 https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0b013e3181edac3e

Bliss DZ, Hurlow J, Cefalu J Refinement of an instrument for assessing incontinent-associated dermatitis and its severity for use with darker-toned skin. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2014; 41:(4)365-370 https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0000000000000034

Clarke-O'Neill S, Farbrot A, Lagerstedt M-L An exploratory study of skin problems experienced by UK nursing home residents using different pad designs. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2015; 42:(6)621-631 https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0000000000000177

Scotland NAoTVN. Skin Excoriation Tool for Incontinent Patients. 2008. http://bit.ly/2AtYEno (accessed 5 January 2018)

Beeckman D, Van den Bussche K Towards an international language for incontinence-associated dermatitis (IAD): design and evaluation of psychometric properties of the Ghent Global IAD Categorisation Tool (GLOBIAD) in 30 countries. Br J Dermatology.

Gibson DJ. An ex vivo comparison of 2 cyanoacrylate skin protectants. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2018; 45:(1)31-36 https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0000000000000391

Karadsheh M, Nelson J, Rechner B, Wilcox R. Application of a skin adhesive to maintain seal in negative pressure wound therapy: demonstration of a new technique. Wounds. 2017; 29:(11)E106-E110

Prince D, Solanki Z, Varughese R Antibacterial effect and proposed mechanism of action of a topical surgical adhesive. Am J Infect Control. 2018; 46:(1)26-29 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2017.07.008

Lipp A, Phillips C, Harris P, Dowie I. Cyanoacrylate microbial sealants for skin preparation prior to surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008062.pub3

Singer AJ, Perry LC, Allen RL In vivo study of wound bursting strength and compliance of topical skin adhesives. Acad Emerg Med. 2008; 15:(12)1290-1294 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00273.x

Woo KY, Chakravarthy D. A laboratory comparison between two liquid skin barrier products. Int Wound J. 2014; 11:(5)561-566 https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12325

Milne CT, Saucier D, Trevellini C, Smith J. Evaluation of a cyanoacrylate dressing to manage peristomal skin alterations under ostomy skin barrier wafers. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2011; 38:(6)676-679 https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0b013e318234550a

Ratliff CR. Early peristomal skin complications reported by WOC nurses. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2010; 37:(5)505-510 https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0b013e3181edac57

Woo KY. Health economic benefits of cyanoacrylate skin protectants in the management of superficial skin lesions. Int Wound J. 2014; 11:(4)431-437 https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12237

Wound dressing options for exudate and moisture management: demystifying cyanoacrylate

02 January 2018
Volume 2 · Issue 1

Abstract

Maintaining skin integrity is a benchmark for patient safety and quality of care. While various measures are imperative to maintain and improve the integrity of skin, such as optimal nutrition and hydration, continence management, skin hygiene, and regular moisturisers, this article highlights the potential benefit of innovative skin barriers, such as cyanoacrylates, against moisture-associated skin damage. Peer-reviewed clinical evidence, using cyanoacrylate liquid skin protectant to treat and prevent moisture damage, has demonstrated the ability of these products to reduce discomfort, improve healing outcomes and patient satisfaction, and reduce healthcare expenditure.

Maintaining skin integrity is espoused by several international authorities as a benchmark for patient safety and quality of care. The purpose of this article is to outline the intricate, exquisite structure of the skin as a barrier and the importance of optimal skin hydration to promote skin health. A plethora of topical agents are available to enhance skin protection, we aim to demystify the properties of cyanoacrylate.

The skin is the human body's largest organ and occupies an area of 1.5m2 to 2m2, representing 15% of the body's weight.1 It consists of the outermost epidermis, the dermis, and the underlying subcutaneous tissue. The epidermis is very thin, at approximately 0.1mm in most areas of the body, and only on the palms of the hand and soles of the feet is the layer thicker at 1–2mm. The epidermis is also avascular and divided into four main layers corresponding to the progressive stages of cellular differentiation: stratum corneum, stratum granulosum, stratum spinosum and stratum basale, at the base.1,2

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Wound Central and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for wound care professionals. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Access to clinical or professional articles

  • New content and clinical updates each month