References

Partsch H., Clark M., Bassez S. Measurement of lower leg compression in vivo: recommendations for the performance of measurements of interface pressure and stiffness: a consensus statement. Dermatol Surg. 2006; 32:229-238

Partsch H., Clark M., Mosti G. Classification of compression bandages: practical aspects. Dermatol Surg. 2008; 34:600-609

Kravitz S., Hegarty-Craver M, Reid L. Challenging present concepts in compression therapy: static stiffness index is not consistent and not clinically relevant. J Wound Care. 2016; 25:(2)S4-S8

Thomas S. Practical limitations of two devices used for the measurement of sub-bandage pressure: implications for clinical practice. J Wound Care. 2014; 23:(6)300-309

Mosti G., Partsch H., Schuren J., Thomas S. Letters. J Wound Care. 2015; 24:(3)157-158

Comité Europeen de Normalisation: Adopted European prestandard. Medical compression hosiery ENV 12718, Brussels 2001.

Partsch H., Rabe E., Stemmer R. Compression therapy of the extremities.: Editions Phlebologiques Francaises; 2000

Stolk R., Van der Wegen-Franken C.P., Neumann H.A. A method for measuring the dynamic behavior of medical compression hosiery during walking. Dermatol Surg. 2004; 30:(5)729-736

Van der Wegen-Franken K., Tank B., Neumann H. Correlation between the static and dynamic stiffness indices of medical compression stockings. Dermatol Surg. 2008; 34:1477-1485

Hirai M, Niimi K., Miyazaki K. Development of a device to determine the stiffness of elastic garments and bandages. Phlebology. 2011; 26:(7)285-291

Partsch H. The static stiffness index: a simple method to assess the elastic property of compression material in vivo. Dermatol Surg. 2005; 31:(6)625-630

Partsch H. The use of pressure change on standing as a surrogate measure of the stiffness of a compression bandage. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2005; 30:(4)415-421

Schuren J., Bichel J. Sub-bandage dynamics: stiffness unravelled. Veins and Lymphatics. 2013; 2:(e2)3-6

Mosti G.B., Mattaliano V. Simultaneous changes of leg circumference and interface pressure under different compression bandages. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007; 33:(4)476-482

Christopoulos D.G., Nicolaides A.N., Szendro G. Air-plethysmography and the effect of elastic compression on venous hemodynamics of the leg. J Vasc Surg. 1987; 5:(1)148-159

Spence R.K., Cahall E. Inelastic versus elastic leg compression in chronic venous insufficiency: a comparison of limb size and venous hemodynamics. J Vasc Surg. 1996; 24:(5)783-787

Ibegbuna V., Delis K.T., Nicolaides A.N., Aina O. Effect of elastic compression stockings on venous hemodynamics during walking. J Vasc Surg. 2003; 37:(2)420-425

Poelkens F., Thijssen D.H., Kersten B. Counteracting venous stasis during acute lower leg immobilization. Acta Physiol. 2006; 186:(2)111-118

Mosti G., Partsch H. Measuring venous pumping function by strain-gauge plethysmography. Int Angiol. 2010; 29:(5)421-425

Schuren J. Compression unravelled.: Margreff Druck GmbH, Essen Germany; 2011

Partsch H., Mosti G. Comparison of three portable instruments to measure compression pressure. Int Angiol. 2010; 29:(5)426-430

Neumann H.A., Partsch H., Mosti G., Flour M. Classification of compression stockings: report of the meeting of the International Compression Club, Copenhagen. Int Angiol. 2016; 35:(2)122-128

Partsch H., Partsch B., Braun W. Interface pressure and stiffness of ready made compression stockings: comparison of in vivo and in vitro measurements. J Vasc Surg. 2006; 44:(4)809-814

Suehiro K., Morikage N., Murakami M Putting a class I stocking over a class I stocking does not make a class II stocking. Ann Vasc Dis. 2012; 5:(4)435-438

Hirai M., Partsch H. The mannequin leg: a new instrument to assess stiffness of compression materials. Veins and Lymphatics. 2013; 2:(e3)7-10

Van der Wegen-Franken K., Roest W., Tank B., Neumann M. Calculating the pressure and the stiffness in three different categories of class II medical elastic compression stockings. Dermatol Surg. 2006; 32:(2)216-223

Van der Wegen-Franken CP., Mulder P., Tank B, Neumann HA. Variation in the dynamic stiffness index of different types of medical elastic compression stockings. Phlebology. 2008; 23:(2)77-84

Van der Wegen-Franken CP., Tank B., Nijsten T., Neumann HA. Changes in the pressure and the dynamic stiffness index of medical elastic compression stockings after having been worn for eight hours: a pilot study. Phlebology. 2009; 24:(1)31-37

Mosti G., Mattaliano V., Partsch H. Influence of different materials in multicomponent bandages on pressure and stiffness of the final bandage. Dermatol Surg. 2008; 34:(5)631-639

Hirai M. The effect of posture and exercise on elastic stocking compression at different sites of the leg. Vasa. 1999; 28:(3)190-194

Wong I.K., Man M.B., Chan OS. Comparison of the interface pressure and stiffness of four types of compression systems. J Wound Care. 2012; 21:(4)161-167

Suehiro K., Morikage N., Murakami M. Study on different bandages and application techniques for achieving stiffer compression. Phlebology. 2015; 30:(2)92-97

Schuren J, Vos A, Allen J. Venous leg ulcer patients with low ABPI's: how much pressure is safe and can be tolerated?. EWMA Journal. 2010; 10:(3)29-34

Mosti G., Partsch H. Inelastic bandages maintain their hemodynamic effectiveness over time despite significant pressure loss. J Vasc Surg. 2010; 52:(4)925-931

Damstra R.J., Partsch H. Prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of adjustable compression Velcro wraps versus inelastic multicomponent compression bandages in the initial treatment of leg lymphedema. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2013; 1:(1)13-19

Mosti G., Cavezzi A., Partsch H. Adjustable velcro compression devices are more effective than inelastic bandages in reducing venous edema in the initial treatment phase: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015; 50:(3)368-374

Schuren J., Mohr K. Pascal's law and the dynamics of compression therapy: a study on healthy volunteers. Int Angiol. 2010; 29:431-435

Mauck K.F., Asi N., Elraiyah TA. Comparative systematic review and meta-analysis of compression modalities for the promotion of venous ulcer healing and reducing ulcer recurrence. J Vasc Surg. 2014; 60:(2)71S-90S

Zarchi K., Jemec G.B. Delivery of compression therapy for venous leg ulcers. JAMA Dermatol. 2014; 150:(7)730-736

Partsch H., Damstra R.J., Mosti G. Dose finding for an optimal compression pressure to reduce chronic edema of the extremities. Int Angiol. 2011; 30:(6)527-533

Mosti G., Iabichella M.L., Partsch H. Compression therapy in mixed ulcers increases venous output and arterial perfusion. J Vasc Surg. 2012; 55:(1)122-128

Van Geest A.J., Veraart J.C., Nelemans P., Neumann H.A. The effect of medical elastic compression stockings with different slope values on edema: measurements underneath three different types of stockings. Dermatol Surg. 2000; 26:(3)244-247

Mosti G., Picerni P., Partsch H. Compression stockings with moderate pressure are able to reduce chronic leg oedema. Phlebology. 2011; 27:(6)289-296

Partsch H., Menzinger G., Mostbeck A. Inelastic leg compression is more effective to reduce deep venous refluxes than elastic bandages. Dermatol Surg. 1999; 25:(9)695-700

Mosti G., Partsch H. Duplex scanning to evaluate the effect of compression on venous reflux. Int Angiol. 2010; 29:(5)416-420

Partsch H. Improving the venous pumping function in chronic venous insufficiency by compression as dependent on pressure and material. Vasa. 1984; 13:(1)58-64

Mosti G., Mattaliano V., Partsch H. Inelastic compression increases venous ejection fraction more than elastic bandages in patients with superficial venous reflux. Phlebology. 2008; 23:(6)287-294

Partsch H., Mosti G. Sport socks do not enhance calf muscle pump function but inelastic wraps do. Int Angiol. 2014; 33:(6)511-517

Mosti G., Mattaliano V., Partsch H. Inelastic compression increases venous ejection fraction more than elastic bandages in patients with superficial venous reflux. Phlebology. 2008; 23:(6)287-294

The static stiffness index: an important parameter to characterise compression therapy in vivo

02 April 2017
Volume 1 · Issue 2

Abstract

The compression pressure, which corresponds to the dosage of compression therapy, has been widely neglected up to now, not only concerning scientific literature, but also in clinical practice. It is evident that compression pressures in the upright position and during walking are clinically more relevant than just the resting pressure. The Static Stiffness Index (SSI), which is the difference between standing and resting pressure, is a valuable parameter characterising the efficacy of a specific compression product to narrow/occlude the venous lumen. This is a prerequisite for reducing venous reflux and exerting a massaging effect necessary to improve the venous pumping function during movement. This article provides an overview of the recent literature on the SSI, which supports the recommendations of the International Compression Club. In addition, it aims to provide an insight on the importance of the SSI in daily practice, as an educational tool as well as in defining the properties of applied compression therapy in clinical research.

The International Compression Club (ICC) consists of a group of experts in compression therapy from both the medical field and industry, and was founded to provide a valuable basis for further improvements of internationally accepted regulations and guidelines on all aspects of compression therapy. Since its foundation in 2004, several consensus documents have been published, in two, clear guidelines are described on methods used to define the properties of applied compression.1,2 Since then, for many researchers and clinicians, the Static Stiffness Index (SSI) became a routine during the application of compression therapy.

Recently, the value of the SSI was questioned for not being consistent nor clinically relevant.3 Also accuracy of the routinely used devices for the measurement of sub-bandage pressure, as well as the validity of publications reliant on measurements with these devices, was subject of debate.4,5

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Wound Central and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for wound care professionals. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Access to clinical or professional articles

  • New content and clinical updates each month