References

Proceedings of the Global IAD Expert Panel. Incontinence-Associated Dermatitis: Moving Prevention Forward. 2015. http://tinyurl.com/hr28grk (accessed 24 February 2017)

Doughty D, Junkin J, Kurz P Incontinenceassociated dermatitis: consensus statements, evidence-based guidelines for prevention and treatment, and current challenges. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2012; 39:(3)303-15 https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0b013e3182549118

Shiu SR, Hsu MY, Chang SC, Chung HC, Hsu HH. Prevalence and predicting factors ofincontinence-associated dermatitis among intensive care patients. J Nurs Healthcare Res. 2013; 9:(3)

Voegeli D. Moisture-associated skin damage: aetiology, prevention and treatment. Br J Nurs. 2012; 21:(9)517-521 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2012.21.9.517

Newman D, Preston A, Salazar S. Moisture control, urinary and faecal incontinence, and perineal skin management, 4th edn. In: Krasner D, Rodeheaver GT, Sibbald R, Woo KY (eds). : HMP Communications; 2007

Borchert K, Bliss DZ, Savik K, Radosevich DM. The incontinence-associated dermatitis and its severity instrument: development and validation. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2010; 37:(5)527-35 https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0b013e3181edac3e

Beeckman D, Van Lancker A, Van Hecke A, Verhaeghe S. A systematic review and meta-analysis of incontinence-associated dermatitis, incontinence, and moisture as risk factors for pressure ulcer development. Res Nurs Health. 2014; 37:(3)204-18 https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.21593

Gray M, Bliss DZ, Doughty DB Incontinence-associated dermatitis: a consensus. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2007; 34:(1)45-54

Long MA, Reed LA, Dunning K, Ying J. Incontinenceassociated dermatitis in a long-term acute care facility. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2012; 39:(3)318-27 https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0b013e3182486fd7

Health and Social Care Information Centre. Prescription cost analysis: England 2014. 2014. http://www.hscic.gov.uk (accessed 29 February 2016)

Fore-Pfliger J. The Epidermal Skin Barrier: Implications for the Wound Care Practitioner, Part I. Advances in Skin & Wound Care. 2004; 17:(8)417-425

Harding CR. The stratum corneum: structure and function in health and disease. Dermatol Ther. 2004; 17:6-15

Beeckman D, Woodward S, Gray M. Incontinenceassociated dermatitis: step-by-step prevention and treatment. Br J Community Nurs. 2011; 16:(8)382-389 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjcn.2011.16.8.382

Health Improvement Scotland. Excoriation tool. 2014. http://tinyurl.com/jw8be84 (accessed 29 February 2016)

Ali SM, Yosipovitch G. Skin pH: from basic science to basic skin care. Acta Derm Venereol. 2013; 93:(3)261-267 https://doi.org/10.2340/00015555-1531

Ichikawa-Shigeta Y, Sugama J, Sanada H Physiological and appearance characteristics of skin maceration in elderly women with incontinence. J Wound Care. 2014; 23:(1)18-30 https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2014.23.1.18

Beeckman D, Schoonhoven L, Verhaeghe S Prevention and treatment of incontinence-associated dermatitis: literature review. J Adv Nurs. 2009; 65:(6)1141-1154 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.13652648.2009.04986.x

Houwing RH, Arends JW, Canninga-van Dijk MR Is the distinction between superficial pressure ulcers and moisture lesions justifiable? A clinical-pathologic study. Skinmed. 2007; 6:(3)113-117

Mugita Y, Minematsu T, Huang L Histopathology of incontinence-associated skin lesions: inner tissue damage due to invasion of proteolytic enzymes and bacteria in macerated rat skin. PLoS ONE. 2015; 10:(9) https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138117

Campbell JL, Coyer FM, Osborne SR. Incontinenceassociated dermatitis: a crosssectional prevalence study in the Australian acute care hospital setting. Int Wound J. 2016; 13:(3)403-411 https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12322

Kottner J, Blume-Peytavi U, Lohrmann C, Halfens R. Associations between individual characteristics and incontinence-associated dermatitis: a secondary data analysis of a multi-centre prevalence study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2014; 51:(10)1373-1380 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.02.012

Brown DS. Perineal dermatitis: can we measure it?. Ostomy Wound Manage. 1993; 39:(7)28-31

Nix DH. Validity and reliability of the Perineal Assessment Tool. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2002; 48:(2)43-49

Mahoney M, Rozenboom B, Doughty D. Challenges in classification of gluteal cleft and buttocks wounds: consensus session reports. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2013; 40:(3)239-245 https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0b013e31828f1a2e

Defloor T, Schoonhoven L, Fletcher J Statement of the European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel—pressure ulcer classification: differentiation between pressure ulcers and moisture lesions. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2005; 32:(5)302-306

García-Fernández FP, Pancorbo-Hidalgo PL, Agreda JJS. Predictive capacity of risk assessment scales and clinical judgment for pressure ulcers: a meta-analysis. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2014; 41:(1)24-34 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.WON.0000438014.90734.a2

Gray M. Optimal management of incontinence-associated dermatitis in the elderly. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2010; 11:(3)201-210 https://doi.org/10.2165/11311010000000000-00000

Langemo D, Hanson D, Hunter S, Thompson P, Oh IE. Incontinence and incontinence-associated dermatitis. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2011; 24:(3)126-140 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ASW.0000395037.28398.6c

Black JM, Gray M, Bliss DZ MASD part 2: incontinence-associated dermatitis and intertriginous dermatitis: a consensus. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2011; 38:(4)359-370 https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0b013e31822272d9

Morris L. Flexi-Seal faecal management system for preventing and managing moisture lesions. Wounds UK. 2011; 7:(2)88-93

Voegeli D. The effect of washing and drying practices on skin barrier function. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2008; 35:(1)84-90 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.WON.0000308623.68582.d7

Voegeli D. LBF ‘no-sting’ barrier wipes: skin care using advanced silicone technology. Br J Nurs. 2008; 17:(7)472-476

Bolton C, Flynn R, Harvey E, Morris J. Assessment of pad clogging. Journal of Community Nursing. 2004; 18:(6)18-20

European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel PuClas3 eLearning Module. University Centre for Nursing & Midwifery and European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel. 2015;

Incontinence-associated dermatitis: new insights into an old problem

02 January 2018
Volume 2 · Issue 1

Abstract

Incontinence-associated dermatitis (IAD) is a common skin disorder seen in patients with incontinence. Typically IAD presents as inflammation of the skin surface characterised by redness, and in extreme cases, swelling and blister formation. If untreated this usually rapidly leads to excoriation and skin breakdown, which may subsequently become infected by the skin flora. While this is a common condition encountered in all areas of nursing practice, gaps remain in our understanding of the many contributing factors. A lack of standardised definitions of IAD, differences in terminology, and a bewildering increase in products available to prevent and manage IAD, makes it difficult for nurses to deliver evidence-based care. However, it is an area where nursing research has made a considerable contribution over the past few years. This article explores the current thinking on IAD and the implications for nursing practice.

Prolonged contact of the skin with urine or faeces leads to a specific form of moisture-associated skin damage, known as incontinence-associated dermatitis (IAD). While this is a common condition encountered in all areas of nursing practice, gaps remain in our understanding of the many contributing factors. A lack of standardised definitions of IAD, differences in terminology, and a bewildering increase in products available to prevent and manage IAD, make it difficult for nurses to deliver evidence-based care. However, it is an area where nursing research has made a considerable contribution over the past few years, culminating in the development and publication of a set of international best practice principles based on expert consensus.1 This article explores the main principles developed and the implications for nursing practice.

IAD may be regarded as a type of contact dermatitis that occurs in patients who have urinary or faecal incontinence, often causing significant discomfort, and reduced quality of life.2 Typically, IAD presents as inflammation of the skin surface characterised by redness and, in extreme cases, swelling and blister formation (Fig 1). In urinary incontinence this generally affects the labia in women, and the scrotum in men, as well as the inner thigh and buttocks in both sexes. If untreated this usually rapidly leads to excoriation and skin breakdown, which may subsequently become infected by the skin flora, leading to a vicious circle of increased inflammation and skin breakdown. It is generally agreed that urinary incontinence on its own does not necessarily lead to IAD, but combined with faecal incontinence or the passage of liquid stools significantly increases the risk. There is also the possibility that certain medications the patient might be taking also contribute, either by a direct action of drug metabolites excreted in the urine or faeces on the skin, or by drugs increasing the passage of liquid stools as a side effect, such as some antibiotics.3 The exact mechanisms that lead to IAD are not fully understood, although some significant insights have been achieved over the past few years, mainly driven by a continued interest in this area by nurse researchers. The main factors precipitating the skin inflammation are thought to be overhydration of the epidermis and an increase in the skin pH away from the protective acidic range, disrupting the normal skin barrier.4

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Wound Central and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for wound care professionals. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Access to clinical or professional articles

  • New content and clinical updates each month