References

Wolcott RD, Kennedy JP, Dowd SE. Regular debridement is the main tool for maintaining a healthy wound bed in most chronic wounds. J Wound Care. 2009; 18:(2)54-6 https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2009.18.2.38743

Strohal R, Dissemond J, Jordan O'Brien J EWMA document: Debridement. An updated overview and clarification of the principle role of debridement. J Wound Care. 2013; 22:(1) https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2013.22.Sup1.S1

Stanisic MM, Provo BJ, Larson DL Wound debridement with 25 kHz ultrasound. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2005; 18:(9)484-490 https://doi.org/10.1097/00129334-200511000-00012

A closer look at ultrasonic debridement. 2010. https://tinyurl.com/uxaxomw (accessed 5 December 2019)

Madhok BM, Vowden K, Vowden P. New techniques for wound debridement. Int Wound J. 2013; 10:(3)247-251 https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12045

Braumann C, Lázaro-Martínez J, Schultz G Söring UAW Made Easy.: Wounds International; 2017

Voigt J, Wendelken M, Driver V Low-frequency ultrasound (20-40 kHz) as an adjunctive therapy for chronic wound healing: a systematic review of the literature and metaanalysis of eight randomized controlled trials. Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2011; 10:(4)190-199 https://doi.org/10.1177/1534734611424648

Cimino WW, Bond LJ. Physics of ultrasonic surgery using tissue fragmentation: Part I. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1996; 22:(1)89-100 https://doi.org/10.1016/03015629(95)02021-7

Chang Y-JR, Perry J, Cross K. Low-frequency ultrasound debridement in chronic wound healing: a systematic review of current evidence. Plast Surg. 2017; 25:(1)21-26 https://doi.org/10.1177/2292550317693813

Crone S, Garde C, Bjansholt T, Alhede M. A novel in vitro wound biofilm model to evaluate low-frequency ultrasonic assisted wound debridement (UAW). J Wound Care. 2015; 24:(2)64-72 https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2015.24.2.64

Chan KK, Watmough DJ, Hope DT A new motor-driven surgical probe and it's in vitro comparison with the Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1986; 12:(4)279-283 https://doi.org/10.1016/03015629(86)90337-6

Amso NN. Applications of therapeutic ultrasound in medicine. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry. 1994; 1:(1)S69-S71 https://doi.org/10.1016/13504177(94)90031-0

Breuing KH, Bayer L, Neuwalder J Early experience using low-frequency ultrasound in chronic wounds. Ann Plast Surg. 2005; 55:(2)183-187 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000168695.20350.07

Butcher G. Low frequency ultrasonic debridement: a new tool in our armoury?. J Foot Ankle Res. 2011; 4 https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-4-S1-P7

Herberger K, Franzke N, Blome C Efficacy, tolerability and patient benefit of ultrasoundassisted wound treatment versus surgical debridement: a randomized clinical study. Dermatology. 2011; 222:(3)244-249 https://doi.org/10.1159/000326116

Butcher G, Pinnuck L. Wound bed preparation: ultrasonic-assisted debridement. Br J Nurs. 2013; 22:(6)S36-S43 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2013.22.Sup4.S36

Ousey K, Rippon M, Stephenson J. Barriers to wound debridement: results of an online survey. Wounds UK. 2016; 12:(4)36-40

Lázaro-Martínez JL, Álvaro-Afonso FJ, García-Álvarez Y Ultrasound-assisted debridement of neuroischaemic diabetic foot ulcers, clinical and microbiological effects: a case series. J Wound Care. 2018; 27:(5)278-286 https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2018.27.5.278

Lipsky BA, Berendt AR, Cornia PB 2012 Infectious Diseases Society of America clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of diabetic foot infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2012; 54:(12)e132-e173 https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cis346

Position document. Identifying criteria for wound infection.: MEP; 2005

Marvin JA. Pain assessment versus measurement. J Burn Care Rehabil. 1995; 16:348-357 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004630199505001-00003

Wollina U, Schmidt W-D, Krönert C Some effects of a topical collagen-based matrix on the microcirculation and wound healing in patients with chronic venous leg ulcers: preliminary observations. Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2005; 4:(4)214-224 https://doi.org/10.1177/1534734605283001

Wang D, Stockard CR, Harkins L Immunohistochemistry in the evaluation of neovascularization in tumor xenografts. Biotech Histochem. 2008; 83:(3–4)179-89 https://doi.org/10.1080/10520290802451085

Maan ZN, Januszyk M, Rennert RC Noncontact, low-frequency ultrasound therapy enhances neovascularization and wound healing in diabetic mice. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014; 134:(3)402e-411e https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000000467

Roper JA, Williamson RC, Bally B Ultrasonic stimulation of mouse skin reverses the healing delays in diabetes and aging by activation of rac1. J Invest Dermatol. 2015; 135:(11)2842-2851 https://doi.org/10.1038/jid.2015.224

Michailidis L, Butcher G, Davis A. Low frequency ultrasonic debridement: a clinical experience. J Foot Ankle Res. 2011; 4 https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-4S1-P41

Shannon MK, Williams A, Bloomer M. Low frequency ultrasound debridement (Sonoca-185) in acute wound management: a case study. Wound practice and research. 2012; 20:(4)200-205

Michailidis L, Williams CM, Bergin SM Comparison of healing rate in diabetes-related foot ulcers with low frequency ultrasonic debridement versus non-surgical sharps debridement: a randomised trial protocol. J Foot Ankle Res. 2014; 7 https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-7-1

Michailidis L, Kotsanas D, Orr E Does the new low-frequency ultrasonic debridement technology pose an infection control risk for clinicians, patients, and the clinic environment?. Am J Infect Control. 2016; 44:(12)1656-1659 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2016.04.228

Ultrasonic-assisted wound debridement: report from a closed panel meeting

02 February 2021
Volume 5 · Issue 1

Abstract

Mechanical debridement can be considered as an alternative to surgical debridement if surgery is not available, or is considered impractical or too high risk. One form of selective mechanical debridement is ultrasonic-assisted wound (UAW) debridement. As the published evidence on this is limited, a closed international expert meeting was held to review the existing evidence base on it, present preliminary findings of research currently in progress and discuss individual cases selected from the clinical experts' own practice. The panel also explored the potential barriers to the implementation of UAW debridement and how these might be addressed. It concluded there is sufficient evidence that UAW debridement is an effective method of cleansing and debriding almost all hard-to-heal wounds. Patients who are most likely to benefit from it are not medically stable, on anticoagulants, unable to visit a hospital for wound treatment, and/or have wounds with a poor vascular supply or are close to critical structures. The panel also observed that UAW debridement can be used to prepare the wound for negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) or as an adjunctive to it. Given the potential to experience pain during the procedure, the panel considered that patients will benefit from topical analgesia. The panel noted that health professionals, patients and visitors must be protected from the aerosolisation associated with UAW, to reduce risk of cross-contamination.

Sequential debridement has been the cornerstone of wound management for decades. This practice was reinforced in 2008 when awareness of the significance of biofilm in hard-to-heal wounds surfaced in the literature.1 Although surgical debridement is considered the gold standard, it is not always practical, available or suitable for each patient. Therefore, alternative debridement strategies, including sharp, mechanical, enzymatic, larval and autolytic, can be considered.2 Mechanical debridement comprises therapeutic irrigation, aggressive cleansing with moistened gauze, monofilament pads, scraping with a dull device and ultrasonic-assisted wound (UAW) debridement, also known as low-frequency contact ultrasonic debridement (LFCUD).

UAW debridement can be used to prepare the wound bed for dressings and/or grafting.3,4,5 Information on UAW debridement, including its indications for use, debridement properties and antimicrobial and antibiofilm effects, has been outlined by Braumann et al.6

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Wound Central and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for wound care professionals. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Access to clinical or professional articles

  • New content and clinical updates each month