References

Guo S, DiPietro LA. Factors affecting wound healing. J Dent Res. 2010; 89:(3)219-229 https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034509359125

Schultz GS, Sibbald RG, Falanga V Wound bed preparation: a systematic approach to wound management. Wound Repair Regen. 2003; 11:(s1)S1-S28 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1524-475X.11.s2.1.x

Stebbins WG, Neel V. Primary surgical closure versus second-intention healing (SIH) after Mohs micrographic surgery: Patient satisfaction and clinical implications. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016; 75:(2)e71-e72 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2016.02.1238

Landén NX, Li D, Ståhle M. Transition from inflammation to proliferation: a critical step during wound healing. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2016; 73:(20)3861-3885 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-016-2268-0

Qing C. The molecular biology in wound healing & non-healing wound. Chin J Traumatol. 2017; 20:(4)189-193 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjtee.2017.06.001

Achar RA, Silva TC, Achar E Use of insulin-like growth factor in the healing of open wounds in diabetic and non-diabetic rats. Acta Cir Bras. 2014; 29:(2)125-131 https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-86502014000200009

Sharif MO, Tejani-Sharif A, Kenny K, Day PF. A systematic review of outcome measures used in clinical trials of treatment interventions following traumatic dental injuries. Dent Traumatol. 2015; 31:(6)422-428 https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12227

Singer AJ, Clark RA. Cutaneous wound healing. N Engl J Med. 1999; 341:(10)738-746 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199909023411006

Costerton JW. Overview of microbial biofilms. J Ind Microbiol. 1995; 15:(3)137-140 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01569816

Hall-Stoodley L, Costerton JW, Stoodley P. Bacterial biofilms: from the natural environment to infectious diseases. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004; 2:(2)95-108 https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro821

Bradley M, Cullum N, Nelson EA Systematic reviews of wound care management: (2). Dressings and topical agents used in the healing of chronic wounds. Health Technol Assess. 1999; 3:(17 Pt 2)1-35

Breuing KH, Bayer L, Neuwalder J, Orgill DP. Early experience using low-frequency ultrasound in chronic wounds. Ann Plast Surg. 2005; 55:(2)183-187 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000168695.20350.07

Carmen JC, Runyan CM, Robison RA Ultrasonic-enhanced gentamicin transport through colony biofilms of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli. J Infect Chemother. 2004; 10:(4)193-199 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10156-004-0319-1

Qian Z, Sagers RD, Pitt WG. Investigation of the mechanism of the bioacoustic effect. J Biomed Mater Res. 1999; 44:(2)198-205 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199902)44:2<198::AIDJBM10>3.0.CO;2-P

Alhede M, Bjarnsholt T, Givskov M, Alhede M. Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms. Adv Appl Microbiol. 2014; 86:1-40 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800262-9.00001-9

Kavros SJ, Coronado R. Diagnostic and therapeutic ultrasound on venous and arterial ulcers. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2018; 31:(2)55-65 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ASW.0000527967.10613.87

Ortiz LA, Zhang B, McCarthy MW Treatment of enterocutaneous fistulas, then and now. Nutr Clin Pract. 2017; 32:(4)508-515 https://doi.org/10.1177/0884533617701402

Siegman-Igra Y, Shafir R, Weiss J Serious infectious complications of midsternotomy: a review of bacteriology and antimicrobial therapy. Scand J Infect Dis. 1990; 22:(6)633-643 https://doi.org/10.3109/00365549009027114

Tewarie L., Moza AK., Zayat R., Autschbach R. Ultrasound-assisted treatment of sternocutaneous fistula in post-sternotomy cardiac surgery patients. European Journal of cardio-thoracic surgery. 2015; 47:e180-e187

Moulin VJ, Dubé J, Rochette-Drouin O Electric potential across epidermis and its role during wound healing can be studied by using an in vitro reconstructed human skin. Adv Wound Care. 2012; 1:(2)81-87 https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2011.0318

Hess CL, Howard MA, Attinger CE. A review of mechanical adjuncts in wound healing: hydrotherapy, ultrasound, negative pressure therapy, hyperbaric oxygen, and electrostimulation. Ann Plast Surg. 2003; 51:(2)210-218 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.SAP.0000058513.10033.6B

Jnger M, Arnold A, Zuder D Local therapy and treatment costs of chronic, venous leg ulcers with electrical stimulation (Dermapulse): a prospective, placebo controlled, double blind trial. Wound Repair Regen. 2008; 16:(4)480-487 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524475X.2008.00393.x

Kitajo K, Nozaki D, Ward LM, Yamamoto Y. Behavioral stochastic resonance within the human brain. Phys Rev Lett. 2003; 90:(21) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.218103

Kloth LC. Electrical stimulation for wound healing: a review of evidence from in vitro studies, animal experiments, and clinical trials. Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2005; 4:(1)23-44 https://doi.org/10.1177/1534734605275733

Bogie KM, Reger SI, Levine SP, Sahgal V. Electrical stimulation for pressure sore prevention and wound healing. Assist Technol. 2000; 12:(1)50-66 https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2000.10132009

Prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers: quick reference guide. In: Haesler E (ed). : Cambridge Media; 2014

Fraccalvieri M, Salomone M, Zingarelli EM Electrical stimulation for difficult wounds: only an alternative procedure?. Int Wound J. 2015; 12:(6)669-673 https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12194

Zeng FG, Fu QJ, Morse R. Human hearing enhanced by noise. Brain Res. 2000; 869:(1–2)251-255 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-8993(00)02475-6

Polak A, Taradaj J, Nawrat-Szoltysik A Reduction of pressure ulcer size with high-voltage pulsed current and highfrequency ultrasound: a randomised trial. J Wound Care. 2016; 25:(12)742-754 https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2016.25.12.742

Miller C, McGuiness W, Wilson S Venous leg ulcer healing with electric stimulation therapy: a pilot randomised controlled trial. J Wound Care. 2017; 26:(3)88-98 https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2017.26.3.88

Zeitler E, Kaiser W, Schuierer G [ECG-triggered NMR-tomography of the heart. Pathological findings]. RoFo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Nuklearmed. 1985; 142:(3)275-281 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1052648

Avrahami R, Rosenblum J, Gazes M The effect of combined ultrasound and electric field stimulation on wound healing in chronic ulcerations. Wounds. 2015; 27:(7)199-208

Johnson KE., Wilgus T.A. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Angiogenesis in the Regulation of Cutaneous Wound Repair. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2014; 1; 3:(10)647-661

Polak A, Kloth LC, Blaszczak E The efficacy of pressure ulcer treatment with cathodal and cathodal-anodal high-voltage monophasic pulsed current: a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Phys Ther. 2017; 97:(8)777-789 https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzx052

Seeliger C, Falldorf K, Sachtleben J, Griensven M. Low-frequency pulsed electromagnetic fields significantly improve time of closure and proliferation of human tendon fibroblasts. Eur J Med Res. 2014; 19:(1) https://doi.org/10.1186/2047-783X-19-37

Ud-Din S, Sebastian A, Giddings P Angiogenesis is induced and wound size is reduced by electrical stimulation in an acute wound healing model in human skin. PLoS One. 2015; 10:(4) https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124502

Chao PG, Lu HH, Hung CT Effects of applied DC electric field on ligament fibroblast migration and wound healing. Connect Tissue Res. 2007; 48:(4)188-197 https://doi.org/10.1080/03008200701424451

Guerriero F, Botarelli E, Mele G Effectiveness of an innovative pulsed electromagnetic fields stimulation in healing of untreatable skin ulcers in the frail elderly: two case reports. Case Rep Dermatol Med. 2015; 2015:1-6 https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/576580

Montagnier L, Aïssa J, Ferris S Electromagnetic signals are produced by aqueous nanostructures derived from bacterial DNA sequences. Interdiscip Sci. 2009; 1:(2)81-90 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12539-009-0036-7

Brizhik L, Eremko A, Piette B, Zakrzewski W. Effects of periodic electromagnetic field on charge transport in macromolecules. Electromagn Biol Med. 2009; 28:(1)15-27 https://doi.org/10.1080/15368370802708223

Wagner FW The dysvascular foot: a system for diagnosis and treatment. Foot Ankle. 1981; 2:(2)64-122 https://doi.org/10.1177/107110078100200202

Gupta A, Taly A, Srivastava A Efficacy of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy in healing of pressure ulcers: a randomized control trial. Neurol India. 2009; 57:(5)622-626 https://doi.org/10.4103/0028-3886.57820

Kwan RL, Wong WC, Yip SL Pulsed electromagnetic field therapy promotes healing and microcirculation of chronic diabetic foot ulcers: a pilot study. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2015; 28:(5)212-219 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ASW.0000462012.58911.53

Stiller MJ, Pak GH, Shupack JL A portable pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) device to enhance healing of recalcitrant venous ulcers: a double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Br J Dermatol. 1992; 127:(2)147-154 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.13652133.1992.tb08047.x

Mittermayr R, Osipov A, Piskernik C Mol Med. 2007; 13:(1-2) https://doi.org/10.2119/2006-00035.Mittermayr

Pallotta RC, Bjordal JM, Frigo L Infrared (810-nm) low-level laser therapy on rat experimental knee inflammation. Lasers Med Sci. 2012; 27:(1)71-78 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-011-0906-1

Arany PR, Nayak RS, Hallikerimath S Activation of latent TGF-β1 by low-power laser in vitro correlates with increased TGF-β1 levels in laser-enhanced oral wound healing. Wound Repair Regen. 2007; 15:(6)866-874 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-475X.2007.00306.x

Karu T, Pyatibrat L. Gene expression under laser and light-emitting diodes radiation for modulation of cell adhesion: possible applications for biotechnology. IUBMB Life. 2011; 63:(9)747-753 https://doi.org/10.1002/iub.514

Aparecida Da Silva A, Leal-Junior EC, Alves AC Wound-healing effects of low-level laser therapy in diabetic rats involve the modulation of MMP-2 and MMP-9 and the redistribution of collagen types I and III. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2013; 15:(4)210-216 https://doi.org/10.3109/14764172.2012.761345

Nemeth AJ. Lasers and wound healing. Dermatol Clin. 1993; 11:(4)783-789 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0733-8635(18)30231-6

de Sousa AP, de Aguiar Valença Neto AA, Marchionni AM Effect of LED phototherapy (λ700 ± 20 nm) on TGF-β expression during wound healing: an immunohistochemical study in a rodent model. Photomed Laser Surg. 2011; 29:(9)605-611 https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2010.2833

Prindeze NJ, Moffatt LT, Shupp JW. Mechanisms of action for light therapy: A review of molecular interactions. Exp Biol Med. 2012; 237:(11)1241-1248 https://doi.org/10.1258/ebm.2012.012180

Chaves ME, Araújo AR, Piancastelli AC, Pinotti M. Effects of low-power light therapy on wound healing: LASER x LED. An Bras Dermatol. 2014; 89:(4)616-623 https://doi.org/10.1590/abd1806-4841.20142519

Posten W, Wrone DA, Dover JS Low-level laser therapy for wound healing: mechanism and efficacy. Dermatol Surg. 2005; 31:(3)334-340 https://doi.org/10.1097/00042728200503000-00016

Karu TI. Multiple roles of cytochrome c oxidase in mammalian cells under action of red and IR-A radiation. IUBMB Life. 2010; 62:(8)607-610 https://doi.org/10.1002/iub.359

Leite SN, Andrade TA, Masson-Meyers DS Phototherapy promotes healing of cutaneous wounds in undernourished rats. An Bras Dermatol. 2014; 89:(6)899-904 https://doi.org/10.1590/abd1806-4841.20143356

Caetano KS, Frade MA, Minatel DG Phototherapy improves healing of chronic venous ulcers. Photomed Laser Surg. 2009; 27:(1)111-118 https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2008.2398

de Barros Araújo Júnior R, Gonzaga IC, Fernandes GA Low-intensity LED therapy (λ 640±20nm) on saphenectomy healing in patients who underwent coronary artery bypass graft: a randomized, double-blind study. Lasers Med Sci. 2018; 33:(1)103-109 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-017-2354-z

Wang HT, Yuan JQ, Zhang B Phototherapy for treating foot ulcers in people with diabetes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017; 6 https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011979.pub2

AlGhamdi KM, Kumar A, Moussa NA. Low-level laser therapy: a useful technique for enhancing the proliferation of various cultured cells. Lasers Med Sci. 2012; 27:(1)237-249 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-011-0885-2

Enwemeka CS, Parker JC, Dowdy DS The efficacy of low-power lasers in tissue repair and pain control: a meta-analysis study. Photomed Laser Surg. 2004; 22:(4)323-329 https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2004.22.323

Avci P, Gupta A, Sadasivam M Low-level laser (light) therapy (LLLT) in skin: stimulating, healing, restoring. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2013; 32:(1)41-52

Romanelli M, Piaggesi A, Scapagnini G EUREKA study – the evaluation of real-life use of a biophotonic system in chronic wound management: an interim analysis. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2017; 11:3551-3558 https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S142580

Landau Z, Migdal M, Lipovsky A, Lubart R. Visible light-induced healing of diabetic or venous foot ulcers: a placebo-controlled doubleblind study. Photomed Laser Surg. 2011; 29:(6)399-404 https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2010.2858

Nobuta S, Sato K, Nakagawa T Effects of wrist splinting for Carpal Tunnel syndrome and motor nerve conduction measurements. Ups J Med Sci. 2008; 113:(2)181-192 https://doi.org/10.3109/2000-1967-228

Reddy M, Gill SS, Rochon PA. Preventing pressure ulcers: a systematic review. JAMA. 2006; 296:(8)974-984 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.296.8.974

Kubasova T, Horváth M, Kocsis K, Fenyö M. Effect of visible light on some cellular and immune parameters. Immunol Cell Biol. 1995; 73:(3)239-244 https://doi.org/10.1038/icb.1995.39

Zhevago NA, Samoilova KA. Pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokine content in human peripheral blood after its transcutaneous (in vivo) and direct (in vitro) irradiation with polychromatic visible and infrared light. Photomed Laser Surg. 2006; 24:(2)129-139 https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2006.24.129

Aragona SE, Grassi FR, Nardi G Photobiomodulation with polarized light in the treatment of cutaneous and mucosal ulcerative lesions. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2017; 31:(2)213-218

Djurovic A, Marić D, Brdareski Z The effects of polarized light therapy in pressure ulcer healing. Vojnosanit Pregl. 2008; 65:(12)906-912 https://doi.org/10.2298/VSP0812906D

Raffl AB. The use of negative pressure under skin flaps after radical mastectomy. Ann Surg. 1952; 136:(6) https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658195212000-00022

Deaton WR, Clutts GR. Use of negative pressure as a method of draining extensive wounds. Am Surg. 1957; 23:(3)278-280

Mehlsen J, Himmelstrup H, Himmelstrup B Beneficial effects of intermittent suction and pressure treatment in intermittent claudication. Angiology. 1993; 44:(1)16-20 https://doi.org/10.1177/000331979304400103

Provost P, Lam JY, Lacoste L Endothelium-derived nitric oxide attenuates neutrophil adhesion to endothelium under arterial flow conditions. Arteriosclerosis and Thrombosis: a Journal of Vascular Biology. 1994; 14:(3)331-335 https://doi.org/10.1161/01.ATV.14.3.331

Delis KT, Knaggs AL. Duration and amplitude decay of acute arterial leg inflow enhancement with intermittent pneumatic leg compression: an insight into the implicated physiologic mechanisms. J Vasc Surg. 2005; 42:(4)717-725 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2005.06.004

Labropoulos N, Leon LR, Bhatti A Hemodynamic effects of intermittent pneumatic compression in patients with critical limb ischemia. J Vasc Surg. 2005; 42:(4)710-716 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2005.05.051

Alvarez OM, Wendelken ME, Markowitz L, Comfort C. Effect of high-pressure, intermittent pneumatic compression for the treatment of peripheral arterial disease and critical limb ischemia in patients without a surgical option. Wounds. 2015; 27:(11)293-301

Norgren L, Hiatt WR, Harris KA, Lammer J TASC II section F on revascularization in PAD. J Endovasc Ther. 2007; 14:(5)743-744 https://doi.org/10.1177/152660280701400520

Nelson EA, Hillman A, Thomas K. Intermittent pneumatic compression for treating venous leg ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; (5) https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001899.pub4

Lee YN, Lee JS, Han SK, Jung HK. Tissue oxygenation and negative-pressure wound therapy when applied to the feet of persons with diabetes mellitus. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2017; 44:(6)517-523 https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0000000000000378

Dolibog P, Franek A, Taradaj J A randomized, controlled clinical pilot study comparing three types of compression therapy to treat venous leg ulcers in patients with superficial and/or segmental deep venous reflux. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2013; 59:(8)22-30

Rowland J. Intermittent pump versus compression bandages in the treatment of venous leg ulcers. Aust N Z J Surg. 2000; 70:(2)110-113 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1622.2000.01766.x

Dwivedi MK, Srivastava RN, Bhagat AK Pressure ulcer management in paraplegic patients with a novel negative pressure device: a randomised controlled trial. J Wound Care. 2016; 25:(4)199-200 https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2016.25.4.199

Dumville JC, Land L, Evans D, Peinemann F. Negative pressure wound therapy for treating leg ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; (7) https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011354.pub2

Nikolovska S, Arsovski A, Damevska K Evaluation of two different intermittent pneumatic compression cycle settings in the healing of venous ulcers: a randomized trial. Med Sci Monit. 2005; 11:(7)CR337-43

Electromedical devices in wound healing management: a narrative review

02 February 2021
Volume 5 · Issue 1

Abstract

Wound healing is the sum of physiological sequential steps, leading to skin restoration. However, in some conditions, such as diabetes, pressure ulcers (PU) and venous legs ulcers (VLU), healing is a major challenge and requires multiple strategies. In this context, some electromedical devices may accelerate and/or support wound healing, modulating the inflammatory, proliferation (granulation) and tissue-remodelling phases. This review describes some helpful electromedical devices including: ultrasonic-assisted wound debridement; electrotherapy; combined ultrasound and electric field stimulation; low-frequency pulsed electromagnetic fields; phototherapy (for example, laser therapy and light-emitting diode (LED) therapy); biophotonic therapies, and pressure therapies (for example, negative pressure wound therapy, and high pressure and intermittent pneumatic compression) The review focuses on the evidence-based medicine and adequate clinical trial design in relation to these devices.

Wounds can be either acute or hard-to-heal. Acute wounds usually heal in a regular time line; however, wounds that are hard-to-heal depend on topography, ageing, nutrition, pathophysiologic or metabolic factors.1 Wounds or ulcers that generally take longer than three weeks to heal are classed as hard-to-heal.2 vWhile primary or secondary intention skin healing is generally completed within two weeks.3 In hard-to-heal wounds, the healing phases stall, prolonging inflammation, with a consequent reduction in collagen and angiogenesis.4 These wounds are often associated with diabetes, venous stasis, pressure ulcers (PUs), burns and traumatic injuries.5 Thus, early diagnosis and treatment is essential as hard-to-heal wounds have a great impact on patients' quality of life (QoL).

A wide range of stimulation protocols are described for the treatment of hard-to-heal wounds, such as drugs and bioactive dressings, with variable outcomes.6,7,8 Novel wound healing strategies have been developed to overcome shortcomings in standard care. These include tissue engineered scaffolds, gene therapy, stem cell-based therapy and biophysical therapeutic interventions based on light emission (photobiomodulation and biophotonic gels, low-level laser/light therapy), ultrasounds, electrotherapy (or the combined use of electrical field and ultrasounds), compression therapy and electromagnetic field stimulation. These biomedical applications have been successfully applied to different kinds of hard-to-heal wounds, including burns, diabetic foot ulcers (DFU), venous, arterial, and mixed leg ulcers.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Wound Central and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for wound care professionals. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Access to clinical or professional articles

  • New content and clinical updates each month