References

European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel and National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel. Prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers: quick reference guides. 2009. http://www.epuap.org/guidelines/Final_Quick_Prevention.pdf (accessed 18 July 2014)

CG29 Pressure ulcer management: NICE. 2005;

Schuurman J-P, Schoonhoven L, Keller BP, Van Ramshorst B. Do pressure ulcers influence length of hospital stay in surgical cardiothoracic patients? A prospective evaluation. J Clin Nurs. 2009; 18:2456-2463

Bennett G, Dealey C, Posnett J. The cost of pressure ulcers in the UK. Age Ageing. 2004; 33:230-235

Black JM, Cuddigan JE, Walko MA Medical device related pressure ulcers in hospitalized patients. Int Wound J. 2010; 7:358-365

Black JM, Baharestani Edsberg LE Pressure ulcers: avoidable or unavoidable? Results of the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel Consensus Conference. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2011; 57:24-37

Apold J, Rydrych D. Preventing device-related pressure ulcers: using data to guide statewide change. J Nurs Care Qual. 2012; 27:(1)28-34

Reger SI, Ranganathan VK, Sahgal V. Support surface interface pressure, microenvironment and the prevalence of pressure ulcers: an analysis of literature. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2007; 53:50-58

Feuchtinger J, Halfens RJ, Dassen T. Pressure ulcer risk factors in cardiac surgery: a review of the research literature. Heart Lung. 2005; 34:375-385

Clinical Research Efficiency Support Team. Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Pressure Sores. 1998. http://www.gain-ni.org/images/Uploads/Guidelines/woundmanagement-pressure-sores.pdf (accessed 11 July 2014)

Device-related atypical pressure ulcer after cardiac surgery

02 May 2019
Volume 3 · Issue 2

Abstract

Medical devices must be closely monitored to prevent harm to patients. Pressure ulcers secondary to medical devices present a significant health burden in terms of length of stay in hospital and cost. Intensivists, anaesthetists and other professionals involved in managing critically ill patients following cardiac surgery need to be aware that pressure ulcers (PU) may develop in atypical sites and present at a later stage of the hospital stay. This case report highlights the important issue of device-related PUs in the cardiac surgical intensive care setting, particularly when the clinical status of the patient may preclude routine assessment and prophylaxis. An algorithm for preventing such PUs is suggested.

A pressure ulcer is a localised injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear.1 The European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (EPUAP) has classified pressure ulcers (PU) as I–IV depending on their severity (Table 1).1,2 The resource and financial costs of PUs are significant. A Dutch research team observed that in a cohort of cardiothoracic patients the length of stay in the intensive care unit was significantly longer for patients who developed a PU.3 In addition, it is estimated that the financial burden of PUs in the UK is between £1.4–2.1 billion.4

Table 1.

EPUAP Classification of Pressure Ulcer Grading1,2

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Wound Central and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for wound care professionals. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Access to clinical or professional articles

  • New content and clinical updates each month